Skip to main content

Bike needs to go on a diet

Its got to that stage where my bike is starting to be a bit limiting. I've been weighing the various components and well, there is a bit of flab that needs to go, here is the inventory;

1.921.8Powertap Rear Wheel (incl. tyre + skewer)
1.213.8Front Wheel (Bontrager Race X Lite)
0.55.7Saddle Bag (tools, pump, tube)

Frame (incl. pedals. groupset)

0.44.6Saddle + Seatpost + Clamp
8.7100Total Bike Weight

So, it doesn't take a genius to work out where there is the best scope for saving weight. After me of course. I'm not planning on ditching my frame and groupset, certainly a triple is not on the cards - it weighs more and a lot more to go wrong on the day.The saddle and seatpost are relatively lightweight, so we can discount those.

Wheels and Tyres

So the wheels are gonna have to skinny up. The powertap will not be climbing Alpe D'Huez - the stock Race X Lite wheel it replaces, including cassette and tyres is 1.4kg - a whopping half a kilo less.

And those tyres. According to weight weenies the Specialized Armadillo's are a whopping 450g each. I couldn't buy a heavier tyre. By switching to a pair of something like the Maxxis Xenith at 170g each I could save another 560g ... that's over half a kilo, in tyres!

The Support car on my back

The saddlebag just blows my mind - if I puncture on the Alpe I'll just have to walk the rest of the way cause the tubes will be back in the hotel room - thats another half kilo. My water bottles weigh 0.8kg each when full - so I'll be drinking at the top, but not on the way up.


Which just leaves me - I'm sitting at 76kg today and if I lose some weight before the 3rd then great, but I'm not gunning for it - the last thing I need right now is to lose power. So - 7.1kg for bike, 76kg for rider. I'll still need to sustain 290 watts for an hour to break the hour. Unless I adopt the superman position, then, apparently, its 285 watts (!!) ;-)

Better go out and ride....

Popular posts from this blog

W'bal its implementation and optimisation

So, the implementation of W'bal in GoldenCheetah has been a bit of a challenge.

The Science I wanted to explain what we've done and how it works in this blog post, but realised that first I need to explain the science behind W'bal, W' and CP.

W' and CP How hard can you go, in watts, for half an hour is going to be very different to how hard you can go for say, 20 seconds. And then thinking about how hard you can go for a very long time will be different again. But when it comes to reviewing and tracking changes in your performance and planning future workouts you quickly realise how useful it is to have a good understanding of your own limits.

In 1965 two scientists Monod and Scherrer presented a ‘Critical Power Model’ where the Critical Power of a muscle is defined as ‘the maximum rate of work that it can keep up for a very long time without fatigue’. They also proposed an ‘energy store’ (later to be termed W’, pronounced double-ewe-prime) that represented a finit…

Polarized Training a Dialectic

Below, in the spirit of the great continental philosophers, is a dialectic that attempts to synthesize the typical arguments that arise when debating a polarized training approach.

It is not intended to serve as an introduction to Polarized training, there are many of those in-print and online. I think that Joe Friel's blog post is a good intro for us amateurs.

For Synthesis Against A Elite athletes have been shown in a number of studies to train in a polarized manner [1][2][3] There is more than one way to skin a cat. Elite athletes adopt plans that include high-volumes of low intensity and low-volumes of high-intensity. Elite athletes have also been shown to train in a pyramidical manner
[13] B Polarized Zones are between LT1/VT1 and LT2/VT2 [1]
LT1/VT1 and LT2/VT2 can be identified using a number of field based approaches [4][5][6][7]

You can follow guidelines on mapping LT1/LT2 to cycling power to make it useful for amateur cyclists. Polarized zones are har…

W'bal optimisation by a mathematician !

So the integral computation for W'bal was expensive.

I tried to optimise from a domain and  programming perspective, where Dave Waterworth, a mathematician found a much more elegant and fast reformulation.

This means W'bal can EASILY be computed as you ride.

To explain the math here are his words;

I posted a comment on you Blog post on optimising the Wbal model. I've done some more thinking and I defn think it can be done without visiting the previous samples as the Skiba formula can be decomposed further, i.e. From your blog I believe the integral part of the equation is:

Basically this takes a weighted sum of preceding W'exp samples where the weight decays at a rate determined by tau, older samples are weighted less than newer ones. We can approximate as a sum provided tau is large compared to Ts (the sample rate):

Basic properties of exponential functions allow the for…